However, there is no political momentum for deficit reduction at that scale. In order to reduce deficits to the point where the public debt levels off as a share of the economy - a more plausible goal than balancing the budget outright - Congress would have to enact some mix of spending cuts and tax increases equivalent to 2.8 per cent of GDP, or nearly $800 billion per year. The bulk of the increase in the structural deficit has come from higher spending on social security and Medicare benefits as the Baby Boom generation retires.

fiscal situation into better balance and to maintain our ability to invest in key priorities like national security, health care, and addressing climate change,' write Paulson and Geithner. “Policymakers will need to make difficult spending and tax policy decisions to bring the U.S. When we put all this in the blender, we see stagflationary headwinds brewing. Speaking at a Bloomberg investment forum last week, Citadel head Ken Griffen warned of higher inflation lasting decades with de-globalization. Treasury secretaries Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner put out a paper titled 'Building a More Resilient US Economy.' A few weeks ago, we recommended reading a new book called “Permacrisis” for some insight into what might be needed to get us through this challenging economic period. There is an increasing call from independent sources to make something happen on a bipartisan basis.Īspen Economic Strategy Group, a group of former policymakers, top executives and others led by former U.S. The fiscal outlook is catastrophic, and Washington is so dysfunctional, there is little hope of near-term change. In their downgraded outlook assessment, Moody’s projects the debt-to-GDP ratio (120 per cent today) to be 170 per cent by 2042. Congressional Budget Office forecast shows eight to 10 per cent deficits in the coming years with about 40 per cent of the deficit (over US$1 trillion next year) just to cover the interest payments. Senator Joe Manchin appears to be looking for a bipartisan third-party solution and a run at the White House, but unless Congress comes to the middle with him, there is little hope in fiscal prudence from our lens. The trend is alarming and has little hope of curtailing, with increasing political gridlock and polarization. We are now feeling the impact of trying to shrink the balance sheet and fight the inflation triggered by COVID-related policies. This will likely be part of the “easy” government solution, but not the good one.

Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, known as quantitative easing. While I’ve been concerned about the fiscal outlook since the spike in deficits following the 2008-09 financial crisis, the interim solution has been a partial monetization by increasing the size of the U.S. It means very little for your portfolio today, but it speaks to the longer-term decay of fiscal balances that is visibly starting to matter. Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Fitch have already downgraded the U.S. credit outlook to “negative” last week, underscoring America’s worsening fiscal outlook.

Ratings firm Moody’s lowered its assessment of U.S.

Real steel gridlock